BOROCHAT
Newest article: Re: Bring back Murphy Cooper by Jonnym8Yesterday 22:28Yesterday at 22:28:11view thread
Oldest article: Rotherham newspaper by WASP3/12/2024 15:15Tue Dec 3 15:15:18 2024view thread
Match Thread
Views: 796
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/live/crrzx005ng0t
reply to this article | return to the front page
We can all agree that it was awful.....
Views: 574
To see a few Boro 'fans' wearing Liverpool shirts this afternoon
reply to this article | return to the front page
4 people
Re: We can all agree that it was awful.....
Views: 458
Stevenage folk have always supported teams that win things, especially those close to home.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Bring back Murphy Cooper
Views: 702
Charlie Goode is far more of a problem, and in my eyes more of a liability than Dan Sweeney, as he had demonstrated a lot. And can't even play multiple games.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Bring back Murphy Cooper
Views: 85
Sweeney is far better than Goode. I’ don’t understand why Sweeney gets so much hate
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Bring back Murphy Cooper
Views: 595
He had a much better second half, but so did everybody else!
Seeing their keeper throw a paddy at FT was brilliant, time wasting wankers.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Bring back Murphy Cooper
Views: 516
Weird match - better second half but still struggling, then the punchline at the end
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Bring back Murphy Cooper
Views: 498
A theme of the last two seasons seems to be we tail off or run out of steam in the second half of the season. Is this a fitness thing or a confidence thing, something else?
It'd be nice to be a bit more consistent across the season.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Bring back Murphy Cooper
Views: 373
I figured that teams were somewhat "figuring us out" the second time we played them when it happened under Evans, which was obviously in a side that was more successful.
This season it has felt like we were limping to 50 points and then the shackles have somewhat come off in the last couple of weeks.
There will always be a call from fans for transfers to be done in January to fix any problem areas and avoid becoming stale/predictable in lineups/formations/tactics, but we haven't been able to bring in anyone that has had a particular impact during the winter window for a good while and should be working on becoming more versatile/adaptable with the resources we have already in the squad (injuries permitting)
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Bring back Murphy Cooper
Views: 348
Not sure the January transfers have ever improved us as a team, usually players that are unhappy at their club, recovering from injury or their club wants rid.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Bring back Murphy Cooper
Views: 633
Neither are good enough.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Bring back Murphy Cooper
Views: 638
One of them is fine for a club of our stature, but agreed that I hope both of them are not here next season, and I would side with keeping Sweeney of thw two because he can at least play regularly.
Need a pacey CB, a creative midfielder, a pacey wide player, a striker, and GK and RB cover. To replace/improve on the departing Cooper, Smith, King, List and Pressley/Simpson, plus to improve on Goode/Sweeney.
Don't need more than that, we have the core to work with, just need to improve around it.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Bring back Murphy Cooper
Views: 265
On this per Revs post match chat TBF to him seems to realise whilst we have team spirit etc we need more quality in certain areas .
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Bring back Murphy Cooper
Views: 255
Or adjust tactics to match our level of quality.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Bring back Murphy Cooper
Views: 254
Perhaps a bit of both .
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Bring back Murphy Cooper
Views: 604
I'd argue a lb as well.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Thread - TV coverage
Views: 717
Are we on the TV today? Figured we’d be on SkySports Extra/online…
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread - TV coverage
Views: 657
No, not on TV
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread - TV coverage
Views: 680
No right back?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread - TV coverage
Views: 662
Harvey White
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread - TV coverage
Views: 655
Is it? What the hell?!
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread - TV coverage
Views: 648
No haha, Dan Phillps part of a back 5
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread - TV coverage
Views: 645
Absolute dross.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Thread - TV coverage
Views: 633
I've had pure wanks less pure wank than this.
reply to this article | return to the front page
3 people
Re: Match Thread - TV coverage
Views: 621
It’s ok. Revs always does an inspirational halftime team talk.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread - TV coverage
Views: 600
Listy was our only bright spark and he subs him off!
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Thread - TV coverage
Views: 568
IF we keep Revell next season telling u now we will be playing L2 football
Absolute shambles
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Match Thread - TV coverage
Views: 103
We can’t get relegated now. We’ll be in League One next season.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread - TV coverage
Views: 532
Everybody said the same about this season.
Wahhhh, waaaahhhh, waaaaaahhhhhh!
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread - TV coverage
Views: 330
No they didn't. But many of us thought the club would go backwards under Revs. We were right.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Thread - TV coverage
Views: 105
The club hasn’t gone backwards. We’ve just finished lower than last season. There needs to be more clarity of intention on the pitch next season. Hopefully we get that and it leads to better entertainment and a higher finish. It hasn’t been a bad season, it hasn’t been a very entertaining one either.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread - TV coverage
Views: 89
Fully expecting the board (and fans) to demand far more from Revs next season, in terms of entertainment and goalscoring, so the start of next season will be his big test.
This season was all about ensuring some stability and maintaining our League One status after losing the manager and majority of the coaching team that brought us success in the previous seasons, which could easily have led to us falling apart and being relegated (Crawley, anybody?).
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread - TV coverage
Views: 91
Yeah this. Job done really.
Worried for Louis. Players who've been through injuries know their bodies. I didn't like the way he went down. Louis is probably our best player...
Some other thoughts:
I like Jake Young. Must frustrate the hell out of a manager, but there's real talent in there.
Find of the season is Lewis Freestone. He looks old skool, but he's athletic, strong and feisty. Well done Lewis.
There has to be a place in the Boro team for Jordan Roberts.
We've been running a squad of injury prone players (for understandable reasons - wouldn't sign otherwise!) but it makes it hard for Revs to seek consistency.
Now for the summer. I reckon we can't judge the forwards fairly until they have a *proper* L1 midfield behind them.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread - TV coverage
Views: 289
Imagine a club slightly regressing under an inexperienced manager starting out in a managerial career compared to one who has been managing at a decent level for 20 years.
MADNESS.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Thread - TV coverage
Views: 189
Quite right, Chuds. The best form of defence is attack, especially when you know you are wrong. As I recall, Revs has now had two and a half years to show he can't do the job. Can't think of another 'rookie' who would get that long.
reply to this article | return to the front page
3 people
Re: Match Thread - TV coverage
Views: 158
Your griping is even more boring than the football. Patience young man. Things might get more exciting before long
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Thread - TV coverage
Views: 189
The best form of defence is defence.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread - TV coverage
Views: 151
What's the best way to win football matches?
Is it to concede fewer goals than the opposition at all costs, or score more than them...
It's a conundrum.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread - TV coverage
Views: 538
Masterstroke by Revs bringing on Sweeney to equalise.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread - TV coverage
Views: 202
Ha! Yes: when he bought Sweeney on, we were joking that he was trying to defend a 1-0 defeat. Then we noticed he was putting Sweens up front and we all kinda went ‘WTF? How’s THAT supposed to work?!…’
Ohhh…! #Revballgenius
(As an aside, I didn’t even see the goal! So bored was I, and so convinced that we were never gonna score even if the match lasted a year, that I was idly scrolling through my phone when the cheer went up. Oh well, I’ll see it on the highlights I s’pose…)
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Previous thread: Walsall by Steve 197026/4 16:41Sat Apr 26 16:41:56 2025view thread