BOROCHAT
Newest article: Up the Duff by RotterdamboroToday 14:34Today at 14:34:23view thread
Oldest article: Play Offs by Mr Fickle19/10/2024 21:32Sat Oct 19 21:32:35 2024view thread
Next thread: Mansfield on TV by BorojimToday 10:38Today at 10:38:44view thread
‘Kin hell
Views: 1012
Referee has 2 very, very easy decisions to make which if he gets right there is no doubt we win the game. He is clearly not fit to referee at this level.
That said, only scoring 1 at home to a piss poor side is on us. Very poor in game management from Revs, the substitutes were late and wrong. Bringing on Harvey Shite when we’re chasing the game is absolutely baffling, unless of course we were settling for a point.
reply to this article | return to the front page
9 people
Re: ‘Kin hell
Views: 532
Ref was poor, Boro were poor.
Loved the double sub in the 93rd minute. Inspiring stuff again.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: ‘Kin hell
Views: 730
That has to be the worst refereeing I have had the misfortune to witness in my life.
A blatant hand ball (The guys arm was above shoulder level) which both the linesman and referee decide to completely ingnore. And then Roberts get 'scissored' 25 yards out and the spineless official only shows a yellow card. He should not be allowed to ref at this level EVER again.
Edited by Sludgy65 at 18:19:34 on 8th March 2025
Edited by Sludgy65 at 18:19:50 on 8th March 2025
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: ‘Kin hell
Views: 563
Kemp was also offside for his shot that hit the post too, as I was in the main stand directly in line with him, but the lino was 10 yards + behind play and their defender would have looked like he was in line at that wrong angle
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: ‘Kin hell
Views: 834
He is clearly not fit to referee at this level.
That's why he spent the first 45 as a lowly 4th official. Then got to.play referee for the second half, very, very badly.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: ‘Kin hell
Views: 691
Where are you getting that from?
Not seen anywhere or anyone but you say that, and would very much have assumed the offy site or Revs during his interview would have referred to it?
Edited by Chuds at 18:34:36 on 8th March 2025
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: ‘Kin hell
Views: 408
I think it was actually Dean!!!
It was the info sent to us at the time. Afterwards it was explained that the ref was the same. It was actually the Lino that was replaced.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: ‘Kin hell
Views: 384
Cool, I don't need to amend any cells in my spreadsheet, and we can all agree that Greg Rollason is an utterly pathetic excuse of a referee.
reply to this article | return to the front page
6 people
Re: ‘Kin hell
Views: 366
Thanks for clarifying. Didn't think I'd imagined it.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: ‘Kin hell
Views: 630
The photo of their bloke being booked in the second half that the comet have used looks very much like Greg Rollason from a Google search who was listed as the ref. Suggesting no referee change at half time.
Edit: mind you, Ryan Atkin, who was listed as fourth official, also looks similar 🤣
Edited by Sev at 18:48:42 on 8th March 2025
reply to this article | return to the front page
One shot on target
Views: 791
For us. is that right?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: ‘Kin hell
Views: 848
Oh I dunno, I reckon 60 seconds is sufficient time for Young and Goode to turn the game around.
reply to this article | return to the front page
4 people
Revs is tactically clueless
Views: 787
This is what I overheard most fans saying as we left the ground.
reply to this article | return to the front page
3 people
Re: Revs is tactically clueless
Views: 751
Or he should have taken off Phillips and brought King on..
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Revs is tactically clueless
Views: 665
I don't understand how Rev's makes notes for 90 minutes, but fails to make changes early enough to influence the game. Hanlan was getting nothing out of their defence (Admittedly because their No. 23 was playing rugby I think?) The 2 changes struck of trying to hang on for the draw, I know we should have put the game to bed earlier, but come on man, give the subs a chance to grow into the game. 2 Strikers on the bench and we see neither? If he can get it right at Cambridge, why can't he get it right today?
Edited by Sludgy65 at 18:26:46 on 8th March 2025
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Jake Young
Views: 643
Young needs a chance up front. Watching the shooting drills in the warm up and he's clearly the best finisher we have, and he's the only one who strikes the ball cleanly on a regular basis. He barely plays anymore and when he does it's out on the left wing. I don't understand why Revell persisted with Hanlan today who was clearly not having a great game and didn't give Young or Appere (or both of them) a chance. If I was Wallace I wouldn't particularly happy that a striker he supposedly paid 400k for isn't getting a look in over a loanee either
reply to this article | return to the front page
5 people
Re: Jake Young
Views: 567
Also has a good connection footballing wise with Kemp, from when they played together (at Swindon?).
reply to this article | return to the front page
5 people
Re: Jake Young
Views: 489
I’ve often wondered why Revs hasn’t made more of that, especially when our other forward options haven’t been firing on all cylinders.
reply to this article | return to the front page
4 people
Re: Jake Young
Views: 386
Amazed how little hand time he’s had
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Jake Young
Views: 341
Sadly he seems reluctant to play him in his proper position and just sticks him out on the left.
Obviously sees something we don't in training...
reply to this article | return to the front page
Previous thread: Aaron Pressley by SpeckyYesterday 23:25Yesterday at 23:25:42view thread