BOROCHAT

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: WATN by jayessToday 16:40Today at 16:40:51view thread

Oldest article: FA YOUTH CUP by worrier18/11/2024 21:35Mon Nov 18 21:35:54 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: Score prediction Boro v Birmingham city? by WASP11/3 06:29Tue Mar 11 06:29:45 2025view thread

‘Kin hell

By Copes (CDawg)8/3 17:00Sat Mar 8 17:00:09 2025

Views: 1760

Referee has 2 very, very easy decisions to make which if he gets right there is no doubt we win the game. He is clearly not fit to referee at this level.

That said, only scoring 1 at home to a piss poor side is on us. Very poor in game management from Revs, the substitutes were late and wrong. Bringing on Harvey Shite when we’re chasing the game is absolutely baffling, unless of course we were settling for a point.

reply to this article | return to the front page

9 people like this 9 people

Re: ‘Kin hell

By Jonnym88/3 20:09Sat Mar 8 20:09:42 2025In response to ‘Kin hell Top of thread

Views: 1177

Ref was poor, Boro were poor.

Loved the double sub in the 93rd minute. Inspiring stuff again.

reply to this article | return to the front page

2 people like this 2 people

Re: ‘Kin hell

By Sludgy658/3 18:18Sat Mar 8 18:18:55 2025In response to ‘Kin hell Top of thread

Views: 1373

That has to be the worst refereeing I have had the misfortune to witness in my life.
A blatant hand ball (The guys arm was above shoulder level) which both the linesman and referee decide to completely ingnore. And then Roberts get 'scissored' 25 yards out and the spineless official only shows a yellow card. He should not be allowed to ref at this level EVER again.

Edited by Sludgy65 at 18:19:34 on 8th March 2025
Edited by Sludgy65 at 18:19:50 on 8th March 2025

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: ‘Kin hell

By AndyC8/3 19:27Sat Mar 8 19:27:42 2025In response to Re: ‘Kin hell Top of thread

Views: 1193

Kemp was also offside for his shot that hit the post too, as I was in the main stand directly in line with him, but the lino was 10 yards + behind play and their defender would have looked like he was in line at that wrong angle

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: ‘Kin hell

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)8/3 17:49Sat Mar 8 17:49:30 2025In response to ‘Kin hell Top of thread

Views: 1452

He is clearly not fit to referee at this level.


That's why he spent the first 45 as a lowly 4th official. Then got to.play referee for the second half, very, very badly.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: ‘Kin hell

By Chuds8/3 18:34Sat Mar 8 18:34:01 2025In response to Re: ‘Kin hell Top of thread

Views: 1304

Where are you getting that from?

Not seen anywhere or anyone but you say that, and would very much have assumed the offy site or Revs during his interview would have referred to it?

Edited by Chuds at 18:34:36 on 8th March 2025

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: ‘Kin hell

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)8/3 19:03Sat Mar 8 19:03:49 2025In response to Re: ‘Kin hell Top of thread

Views: 1268

Steve and Dean.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: ‘Kin hell

By The Hedgehog8/3 22:17Sat Mar 8 22:17:39 2025In response to Re: ‘Kin hell Top of thread

Views: 1032

I think it was actually Dean!!!

It was the info sent to us at the time. Afterwards it was explained that the ref was the same. It was actually the Lino that was replaced.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: ‘Kin hell

By Chuds9/3 00:01Sun Mar 9 00:01:50 2025In response to Re: ‘Kin hell Top of thread

Views: 1066

Cool, I don't need to amend any cells in my spreadsheet, and we can all agree that Greg Rollason is an utterly pathetic excuse of a referee.

reply to this article | return to the front page

6 people like this 6 people

Re: ‘Kin hell

By Pete (PeteH)9/3 21:08Sun Mar 9 21:08:47 2025In response to Re: ‘Kin hell Top of thread

Views: 669

He'll be the Premier League's problem soon enough.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: ‘Kin hell

By AndyC9/3 23:52Sun Mar 9 23:52:36 2025In response to Re: ‘Kin hell Top of thread

Views: 629

VAR would have been pulling him over to review his decision on the side screen in no time on Saturday

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: ‘Kin hell

By The Hedgehog9/3 09:40Sun Mar 9 09:40:49 2025In response to Re: ‘Kin hell Top of thread

Views: 822

Agreed.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: ‘Kin hell

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)8/3 22:41Sat Mar 8 22:41:55 2025In response to Re: ‘Kin hell Top of thread

Views: 991

Thanks for clarifying. Didn't think I'd imagined it.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: ‘Kin hell

By Sev8/3 18:46Sat Mar 8 18:46:11 2025In response to Re: ‘Kin hell Top of thread

Views: 1280

The photo of their bloke being booked in the second half that the comet have used looks very much like Greg Rollason from a Google search who was listed as the ref. Suggesting no referee change at half time.

Edit: mind you, Ryan Atkin, who was listed as fourth official, also looks similar 🤣

Edited by Sev at 18:48:42 on 8th March 2025

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: ‘Kin hell

By Clogger8/3 17:59Sat Mar 8 17:59:34 2025In response to Re: ‘Kin hell Top of thread

Views: 1351

Disgusting decisions

reply to this article | return to the front page

One shot on target

By WASP (Original Mr Wasp)8/3 17:46Sat Mar 8 17:46:40 2025In response to ‘Kin hell Top of thread

Views: 1406

For us. is that right?

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: ‘Kin hell

By Chuds8/3 17:33Sat Mar 8 17:33:44 2025In response to ‘Kin hell Top of thread

Views: 1458

Oh I dunno, I reckon 60 seconds is sufficient time for Young and Goode to turn the game around.

reply to this article | return to the front page

4 people like this 4 people

Revs is tactically clueless

By WASP (Original Mr Wasp)8/3 17:50Sat Mar 8 17:50:33 2025In response to Re: ‘Kin hell Top of thread

Views: 1420

This is what I overheard most fans saying as we left the ground.

reply to this article | return to the front page

3 people like this 3 people

Re: Revs is tactically clueless

By HitchinBoro exCalling (HitchinBoro exCalling)8/3 17:57Sat Mar 8 17:57:50 2025In response to Revs is tactically cluelessTop of thread

Views: 1366

Or he should have taken off Phillips and brought King on..

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: Revs is tactically clueless

By Sludgy658/3 18:25Sat Mar 8 18:25:19 2025In response to Re: Revs is tactically cluelessTop of thread

Views: 1308

I don't understand how Rev's makes notes for 90 minutes, but fails to make changes early enough to influence the game. Hanlan was getting nothing out of their defence (Admittedly because their No. 23 was playing rugby I think?) The 2 changes struck of trying to hang on for the draw, I know we should have put the game to bed earlier, but come on man, give the subs a chance to grow into the game. 2 Strikers on the bench and we see neither? If he can get it right at Cambridge, why can't he get it right today?

Edited by Sludgy65 at 18:26:46 on 8th March 2025

reply to this article | return to the front page

2 people like this 2 people

Jake Young

By BedsBoro (peanut)8/3 18:53Sat Mar 8 18:53:46 2025In response to Re: Revs is tactically cluelessTop of thread

Views: 1286

Young needs a chance up front. Watching the shooting drills in the warm up and he's clearly the best finisher we have, and he's the only one who strikes the ball cleanly on a regular basis. He barely plays anymore and when he does it's out on the left wing. I don't understand why Revell persisted with Hanlan today who was clearly not having a great game and didn't give Young or Appere (or both of them) a chance. If I was Wallace I wouldn't particularly happy that a striker he supposedly paid 400k for isn't getting a look in over a loanee either

reply to this article | return to the front page

7 people like this 7 people

Re: Jake Young

By Steve 197011/3 21:55Tue Mar 11 21:55:42 2025In response to Jake YoungTop of thread

Views: 490

I have no idea why he has not had a run in the team . He looks so mobile , strong and i think would take his chances . It’s really frustrating his lack of game time .

reply to this article | return to the front page

4 people like this 4 people

Re: Jake Young

By Sev8/3 19:32Sat Mar 8 19:32:44 2025In response to Jake YoungTop of thread

Views: 1203

Also has a good connection footballing wise with Kemp, from when they played together (at Swindon?).

reply to this article | return to the front page

6 people like this 6 people

Re: Jake Young

By Deltic 21 (Spirit of East Coast Boro)8/3 20:36Sat Mar 8 20:36:15 2025In response to Re: Jake YoungTop of thread

Views: 1132

I’ve often wondered why Revs hasn’t made more of that, especially when our other forward options haven’t been firing on all cylinders.

reply to this article | return to the front page

4 people like this 4 people

Re: Jake Young

By Steve 19708/3 22:00Sat Mar 8 22:00:34 2025In response to Re: Jake YoungTop of thread

Views: 1021

Amazed how little hand time he’s had

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Re: Jake Young

By RockyBottom8/3 22:47Sat Mar 8 22:47:32 2025In response to Re: Jake YoungTop of thread

Views: 970

Sadly he seems reluctant to play him in his proper position and just sticks him out on the left.

Obviously sees something we don't in training...

reply to this article | return to the front page

Previous thread: Brum tickets by Rob SBFC10/3 11:43Mon Mar 10 11:43:03 2025view thread