BOROCHAT
Newest article: Re: Your XI for tomorrow? by HitchinBoro exCalling Today 16:44Today at 16:44:21view thread
Oldest article: Tonight
by Bankerbob1/10/2024 10:56Tue Oct 1 10:56:35 2024
4 peopleview thread
Next thread: Tyrece Shade by Sludgy65Yesterday 13:07Yesterday at 13:07:55view thread
Cambridge sack Garry Monk
Views: 1070
To be expected
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Cambridge sack Garry Monk
Views: 277
Appoined Neil Harris AND Mark Bonner!
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Cambridge sack Garry Monk
Views: 262
BOGOF?
Didn't Harris leave them in the lurch as soon as Millwall came sniffing last time?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Cambridge sack Garry Monk
Views: 284
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/c798wgxrdpgo
This must be costing them mega bucks including Monks payoff.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Cambridge sack Garry Monk
Views: 271
They have always been reckless with money
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Cambridge sack Garry Monk
Views: 228
True and realise they get slightly better crowds than us but where is Dosh coming from, no Hollywood FC backer .Assume must have huge debts then
reply to this article | return to the front page
Rotherham
Views: 880
Perhaps an inevitable link - https://footballleagueworld.co.uk/rotherham-united-eyeing-paul-warne-managerial-reunion-after-derby-county-exit/
Would be a little ironic if Revs outlasts Evans though
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Rotherham
Views: 709
Evans would simply get off the managerial merry-go-round at The Abbey, nice and close to home.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Rotherham
Views: 608
Or possibly Evans waits and thinks PW likely to invite him to return for next season ?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Rotherham
Views: 574
I'd take Evans back as a firefighter if we're in the position that Cambridge currently are. Not while comfortably in mid-table though.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Rotherham
Views: 575
But even if we finish mid table so might think can Revs push on next season , hence changing at end of season.Not saying Evans would guarantee this but could be part of PW's thinking.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Rotherham
Views: 404
Not a chance.
Edit: That PW cans Revs this summer to replace him with Evans, I mean, not the pushing on bit.
Edited by Chuds at 13:37:22 on 18th February 2025
reply to this article | return to the front page
4 people
Re: Rotherham
Views: 561
We were poor for the last 3 months under Evans last season.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Rotherham
Views: 171
I'm sure the current squad would get a huge morale boost from seeing Evans back...
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Rotherham
Views: 588
No thanks. I think he's shown throughout his career that he has a limited shelf life, around two seasons, before falling off a cliff. With some of the same players still here, I can't see a reappointment being a success at all.
reply to this article | return to the front page
4 people
Re: Rotherham
Views: 581
You may be right on your final.comment but still might happen especially if Revs and co are on rolling contracts so no compo to pay out
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Rotherham
Views: 562
While we're safe in mid table, I'd be happy to stick with Revs, despite inconsistency frustrations.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Rotherham
Views: 634
Should think the Peterborough job will be coming available soon as well
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Rotherham
Views: 584
Peterborough have history of appointing the same managers over and over as well
Edit: Wallace would never do something like that here...
Edited by BrummieBoro at 08:48:36 on 18th February 2025
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Previous thread: 4 years ago this week. by WASPYesterday 08:48Yesterday at 08:48:39view thread