BOROCHAT
Newest article: Re: Referee yesterday by SevToday 16:27Today at 16:27:45view thread
Oldest article: WATN by MerseyBoro2/8 08:51Fri Aug 2 08:51:13 2024view thread
Next thread: If Vancooten by samborough10/11 11:09Sun Nov 10 11:09:14 2024view thread
Match Thread
Views: 1286
https://x.com/StevenageFC/status/1855249021670973689?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
Good to see Nathan and Pidge back in.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 997
Two shit teams and Murphy Cooper
Our players just gave up on 75 minutes, couldn't be less bothered.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 531
What was you watching I thought we done great today just a shame they pulled one back
reply to this article | return to the front page
4 people
Re: Match Thread
Views: 775
We had a really good first half. The second half we were poor and they were all over us .. they should have scored at least 3, we were lucky to escape with a draw at the end.
We need to be more consistent for 90 mins.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Match Thread
Views: 379
Yep.
Dont see how anyone can see it differently, got absolutely battered 2nd half.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Thread
Views: 916
No Revel changed the shape and told them to sit back at 75 minutes. Exactly the same as the Guisely game. With exactly the same result
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
2 points dropped. Revs has to go!
Views: 1011
So I heard people saying. Some also said this;
After a decent first half, all the hard work was undone by a stream of clueless tactics. Revs is still out of his depth.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: 2 points dropped. Revs has to go!
Views: 556
People often talk crap at football revs is staying well I hope he is who would you like to be nanager
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: 2 points dropped. Revs has to go!
Views: 973
2 points dropped for Reading for me,our keeper got us a point to day.we came out second half and sat back hoping to hang on to a 1-0 lead yet again.Revels subs was to late in the game to bring on.A piss poor second half again with no fire power up from.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: 2 points dropped. Revs has to go!
Views: 566
If we had one 5-0 You would want him gone wouldn’t you
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: 2 points dropped. Revs has to go!
Views: 776
Don't want to see him gone but 1 point out of 12 c'mon
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Match Thread
Views: 998
Thought Reading were decent to be fair. Just couldnt finish.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Thread
Views: 913
You will create chances when you get given the ball every thirty seconds.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 946
Avoided losing 4 in a row, at least.
Next 4 games against teams currently below us (albeit not much of a points difference), so you'd hope to pick up more than the 1 from 12 we've got from the last 4.
Edit: I have heard some people saying it might be a good time to appoint a new manager with a break next week and an easier run of games on paper for a new manager to come in and turn things around, but that's not me.
Edited by Sev at 17:05:00 on 9th November 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 879
Yeah I heard that too today Thought Phillips , Kemp plus Butler all put good shifts in today.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 794
Agree with that...Murphy to add...kept us in it with some amazing saves.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Thick Reading fans
Views: 1107
Trying to count seconds.
I hate them
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Thick Reading fans
Views: 1076
They're actually counting beats but the drummer is missing his cue each time. They'll figure it out.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 1061
Reading fans have recently learned how to count past 10 it would seem.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 1220
TBH all returnees back quicker than expected. Fit or just a necessity ?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 1390
Not sure why Young is so out of favour? Looks our best forward option, when played in the right position.
Edited by RockyBottom at 14:36:37 on 9th November 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
3 people
Re: 1-0
Views: 1029
Sounds like it came from a cross. Who'd have thought.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: 1-0
Views: 1226
Who'd have thought when we had actual CBs (including a RCB) back we would look solid like we did for the opening eleven games before they were all unavilable, and would be picking up a result?
Edited by Chuds at 16:01:41 on 9th November 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
7 people
Re: 1-1
Views: 989
I refuse to believe that Harvey Knibbs is the name of a real person.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: 1-1
Views: 1045
Butler trying to defend their goal with his shirt pulled over his head.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: 1-1
Views: 567
There seems to be some negativity in this thread. I’d like to offer a different perspective. I think today went far, far better than I had expected. Great to see proper quality back in Pidge and NT - it showed too - and Phillips put in a superb performance in the first half and a solidly competent one in the second. Revs clearly knew what was needed and acted on it - the team came out pumped up for that first half and produced a performance noticeably hungrier and more energetic than seen for a long time. I thought some real desire was on display, especially from Kemp who ran his arse off all game, chased down every ball even into injury time, and tallied a well-deserved goal. I had a lot more confidence that the team and Revs knew what had to be done.
Sadly, the second half was slightly off the pace and accuracy of the first half, and as Reading came at us repeatedly it was clear we were going to concede unless the astounding Cooper kept us in it. We could hardly claim their goal was unexpected. The annoying thing about it was that we could have stopped that build-up play all the way through, from Reid lazily failing to challenge at the halfway line to the final pass back at the by-line, so the team can’t complain that they scored, but very frustrating for us fans.
All in all a transformation from previous games and if you’d offered me 1-1 before the match I’d have taken it. Let’s hope that level of confidence and enthusiasm continues into the next match.
reply to this article | return to the front page
5 people
Re: 1-1
Views: 625
I do think a large part of the second half and them coming at us (along with them needing a goal) was tiredness.
A lot of those players have played a lot of minutes recently out if necessity, and a number were making their first appearance after a while out of playing and training through injury. Pidge really looked to be struggling on about 70 minutes for instance, as had NT been for a while. But we didn't have any options on the bench to change it up for many of them so had to stick with it.
I was disappointed we didn't hang on but was perfectly happy with the performance and desire on show. Pidge, NT and Phillips being back made all the difference. And we now have a fortnight until out next league match for them to get fully back to fitness, then we have three very winnable games against Orient, Northampton and Crawley. If they go well, we will be nicely settled in midtable again and looking forwards, with even more players nearing a return from injury.
reply to this article | return to the front page
4 people
Re: 1-1
Views: 849
Agreed. The tiredness was almost certainly contributed to by the energy expended in the first half, which is another reason why today’s performance pleased me.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: 1-1
Views: 663
Like you I thought it was.much better than expected. I did think Rev's should have made a.change in midfield earlier to provide more energy, still might not have been enough but may have given us a bit more protection and drive going forwards.
Most if not all around me clapped the team off at half time. I wonder what the roverall reaction would have been if the two half's were reversed...a lot of fans seem to judges game on the last 20 minutes rather than the 90 minutes.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: 1-1
Views: 954
I think the shitarsedness of our recent form has made people happy to slurp down some pretty thin gruel. Being able to field something resembling a proper back four probably rescued us from another tonking. Phillips will run through a brick wall for you to pass the ball five yards to an opposition player.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: 1-1
Views: 1104
"Being able to field something resembling a proper back four probably rescued us from another tonking"
Bravo, you understand how football works
reply to this article | return to the front page
3 people
Re: 1-1
Views: 463
One third of a functioning team and still relying on multiple good saves isn't that positive to me.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: 1-1
Views: 706
2 shots on target and 34% possession Where's the performance in that game?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: 1-1
Views: 518
Some people are never happy on a Saturday
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Previous thread: Third Kit by Newbie_Boro8/11 12:27Fri Nov 8 12:27:17 2024view thread