BOROCHAT

PITCH INSPECTION AT 5:30

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)Yesterday 16:47Yesterday at 16:47:12

Views: 944

Just announced on X

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: PITCH INSPECTION AT 5:30

By BorobubblesYesterday 17:48Yesterday at 17:48:33In response to PITCH INSPECTION AT 5:30Top of thread

Views: 540

Was a bit late for the travelling away fans

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: PITCH INSPECTION AT 5:30

By AndyCYesterday 20:49Yesterday at 20:49:09In response to Re: PITCH INSPECTION AT 5:30Top of thread

Views: 141

Half of them probably live in London

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: PITCH INSPECTION AT 5:30

By Balders (BALDOCKBORO)Yesterday 18:05Yesterday at 18:05:10In response to Re: PITCH INSPECTION AT 5:30Top of thread

Views: 319

Fuck 'em, they've already paid.

reply to this article | return to the front page

game on

By Copeysaurus (CDawg)Yesterday 17:45Yesterday at 17:45:09In response to PITCH INSPECTION AT 5:30Top of thread

Views: 629

No text

reply to this article | return to the front page

2 people

Re: game on

By borochrisYesterday 17:52Yesterday at 17:52:56In response to game onTop of thread

Views: 497

Is that confirmed?

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: game on

By WASP (Original Mr Wasp)Yesterday 17:57Yesterday at 17:57:22In response to Re: game onTop of thread

Views: 441

https://x.com/broadcastmoose/status/1841156248122638539?s=46&t=itnbzD-LxVE80w6W3cBDgg

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: game on

By Rob SBFC (Big Robbie (SBFC))Yesterday 17:59Yesterday at 17:59:33In response to Re: game onTop of thread

Views: 364

That’s helpful

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: game on

By bcb1994Yesterday 17:56Yesterday at 17:56:48In response to Re: game onTop of thread

Views: 408

Nope just from Moose on twitter. None the clubs said anything as of yet

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: game on

By Danny-da-Bass (Danny-da -Bass)Yesterday 18:11Yesterday at 18:11:03In response to Re: game onTop of thread

Views: 301

Revs has got to check in on the injury’s 1st

reply to this article | return to the front page

The video on Twitter of the pitch

By WASP (Original Mr Wasp)Yesterday 17:15Yesterday at 17:15:42In response to PITCH INSPECTION AT 5:30Top of thread

Views: 837

Not looking good

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: The video on Twitter of the pitch

By NorfolkIANYesterday 17:32Yesterday at 17:32:19In response to The video on Twitter of the pitchTop of thread

Views: 749

Can’t see a video, or have I fallen for a WASP wind up?

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: The video on Twitter of the pitch

By WASP (Original Mr Wasp)Yesterday 17:35Yesterday at 17:35:16In response to Re: The video on Twitter of the pitchTop of thread

Views: 709

No. It was only there. Not on the SFC feed.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: The video on Twitter of the pitch

By SFC JonnyYesterday 17:38Yesterday at 17:38:50In response to Re: The video on Twitter of the pitchTop of thread

Views: 652

/x.com/BroadcastMoose/status/1841154048952598546?t=rHn9TLtbBwEGEUai4wWUtw&s=19

Splash.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: The video on Twitter of the pitch

By SevYesterday 17:43Yesterday at 17:43:40In response to Re: The video on Twitter of the pitchTop of thread

Views: 562

He blocked me.

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: The video on Twitter of the pitch

By Deltic 21 (Spirit of East Coast Boro)Yesterday 17:43Yesterday at 17:43:34In response to Re: The video on Twitter of the pitchTop of thread

Views: 575

Oh poo. That ball isn’t bouncing at all really. Darnit. Was looking forward to that!

Edit: Still am!

Edited by Spirit of East Coast Boro at 17:47:40 on 1st October 2024

reply to this article | return to the front page

Re: PITCH INSPECTION AT 5:30

By SFC JonnyYesterday 16:57Yesterday at 16:57:14In response to PITCH INSPECTION AT 5:30Top of thread

Views: 829

(formerly Twitter)

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person