BOROCHAT
Newest article: Re: Referee yesterday by SevYesterday 16:27Yesterday at 16:27:45view thread
Oldest article: WATN by MerseyBoro2/8 08:51Fri Aug 2 08:51:13 2024view thread
Next thread: Eli King by NorfolkIAN22/8 08:18Thu Aug 22 08:18:52 2024view thread
RevBall
Views: 2727
What was that???????
So negative, no chances.
Any chances made were hit straight at the keeper. Why so many over hit crosses? Can anybody score?
So many questions and so little answers.
This is how Revell plays and has proved it before. Confused why he was given the job.
Roberts and Simpson not good enough, list made no impact, Sweeney shakey again.
Need changes.
Cheers,
InvaderOfPitches
Edited by InvaderOfPitches1 at 15:09:49 on 24th August 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: RevBall
Views: 1767
Revs Ball is negative and pretty boring. What I’ve seen so far is nothing different to his first spell as manager.
I’ve seen people on social media celebrate Steve Evans Rotherham have a tough start to the season. Strange considering what a brilliant job he done at this club.
People will view Revs though with rose tinted glasses as a former player, former manager and a top man who’s been at this club in various guises.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: RevBall
Views: 1634
Equally those who don't want him in the job will view through their "rose" tinted specs too, its human nature to enforce your own opinions
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 1629
You couldn't be any more wrong with the last two paragraphs.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 1628
Being amused by an ex manager doing badly is simply not strange. The Germans invented a word for it - schadenfreude
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 1647
So did the Swedes when referring to Evans
“ Smorgasbord “
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 1589
The modern depiction of Steve Evans is the Dutch version of St Nicholas
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 1727
His approach is very different to his first time around.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 1668
People who think he's the wrong choice will look to amplify any poor performance to back up their opinion.
Those who wanted him to get the job will look for evidence he has improved since last time.
The rest of us will remain cautiously optimistic or mildly pessimistic.
reply to this article | return to the front page
11 people
Re: RevBall
Views: 1952
I wouldn't say we were negative yesterday at burton. In the last half an hour we were the only team that was going to win, if any. And AR replaced a midfielder with a striker, so he certainly wanted to win. The fact Simpson offers nothing up top is a problem, and the fact we have only one creative, attacking midfielder in Kemp. When we get in wide positions the crossing is abysmal. Time and time again we overhit crosses, way too deep to cause problems. Basically this is the difference between a top 6 team and us, having that bit of composure in the final third. I thought the defence played well overall, and in particular Smithy. Pidge's distribution for the most part was very poor, with wildly over hit passes. Roberts offers very little. We definitely MUST start with Appere up top against Lincoln. Unless the chairman finds £5m under his pillow this isn't going to change an awful lot. We are a small club batting above our weight.
reply to this article | return to the front page
7 people
Re: RevBall
Views: 1882
White and Kemp had the fewest touches of any player on our team yesterday, and those are potentially the two most creative.
Our crosses are all from in front of the 18 year box curling towards goal, which to me aren't proper crosses and rarely cause any problems for the opposition. We should be getting to the by line and crossing balls in front there. Rarely did we do that but when we do it causes defenders problems.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: RevBall
Views: 1867
Assume King will be in for White soon ?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 1875
Didn't realise that about the touches.
The fact Kemp still.looked our most dangerous player says a lot.
Revs has to find a way to feed him the ball more.
White only played a bit of the game so more understandable, and I'd expect to see more of him at home than away as he builds experience.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 1895
I'd like to see Kemp more central, behind the striker.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 2063
Four points from three games with two clean sheets, two of those three games being away.
Three clean sheets in five games across all competitions.
Scored in four of five games.
Won three home matches on the spin under Revs.
My bed remains shit free for now, thanks.
reply to this article | return to the front page
12 people
Re: RevBall
Views: 1847
Three games in and we’re only three points above the relegation zone. It’s totally unacceptable. Man the lifeboats.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 1979
I wasn't for the reappointment of Revell. However, it seems stupidly early to throw toys out of the pram. 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss.
At least give it until the clocks go back to a) turn your heating on and b) hang Revell out to dry.
reply to this article | return to the front page
5 people
Re: RevBall
Views: 1963
Agree plus the upcoming transfer deadline could be critical given our injuries.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 2540
Are you related to Rotterdam?
I know it was a bit shit but some perspective would be nice.
reply to this article | return to the front page
3 people
Re: RevBall
Views: 2281
It was more than a bit shit. Poor game, tiny crowd and I bloody hate 12.30 kick-offs.
Like (almost) all of us of here I really wish Revs well, but his post match interview was verging on delusional.
Does anybody else think we really should have seven points by now? We created next to nothing despite his claim we had 'lots' of shots on target. This is a decent squad, but at the moment we are not seeing it to best effect.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 3006
Edit; ignore me, misread :)
Edited by CDawg at 11:16:26 on 26th August 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 1967
It is a decent squad , probably the strongest we have ever had - for us . I suppose the problem is that the other teams in our league have also assembled decent squads . We were the team most likely to score in the second half and looked solid at the back . This is the only game this season we have not scored and have created chances in every game / good chances - missed penalty, List at Huddersfield. We scored 3 away to Norwich and have 2 out of 3 ( in the league ) and 3 out of 5 ( all competitions) clean sheets .
It’s a good solid, promising start to the season. Well it is unless people are thinking we should be on 9 points with a +10 goal difference and won away to Norwich .
I’d say to the moaners - alter your expectations, get behind the team , oh and stop fucking moaning .
reply to this article | return to the front page
8 people
Re: RevBall
Views: 2064
I must admit, I was slightly surprised by his post match interview.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 2540
His post match interview was worrying certainly.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 1981
I just wish he'd stand still, he's like a six year old who really needs a wee.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: RevBall
Views: 3065
I thought that was just you Baldock Boro, hahaha 😆.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 1873
I can’t watch the interviews because of his moving. Makes me feel uncomfortable 🤣
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 1955
Always done it and he must know and can't stop himself ,but like Kane always says er in most sentences .Human thing and thinking about it prob makes it worse for them to try to stop
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 1940
Watch yourself back on video.
It's cringey but it kills annoying physical ticks and comfort words really quickly.
How he presents on camera is really key to how he is perceived. Especially so if he wants to move up the divisions.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: RevBall
Views: 1876
Marcelo Bielsa stares at his feet and only speaks Spanish and he's great fun.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 1971
If Revell sat on a bucket and only spoke Spanish, you'd all be lauding him as a genius!
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 1861
I can only speak for myself but yes, yes I would
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: RevBall
Views: 1948
Yeah, me too actually. Exotic, innit
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 1905
This sounds like a Balders problem!
Football is a results business, unless you played at the highest level so instantly get a top job with zero experience.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 1921
Evans wobbles about and rocks side to side on camera too (and sounds perpetually out of breath and gasping for air), and it hasn't held him back.
Edited by Chuds at 10:02:35 on 25th August 2024
Edited by Chuds at 10:02:49 on 25th August 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: RevBall
Views: 1995
Not an expert, but bit like tourettes could be worse if he tries to correct it .On your final point prob true but shouldn't be
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 2158
According to BBC - 6 shots on target from 11 attempts.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 2338
Yes, but they were tame shots from 20 yards never even troubling the keeper and if anything a sign that we had no idea how to create a proper chance so resorted to just taking pot shots outside the box which Burton would've been more than happy for us to do.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: RevBall
Views: 2075
My take on the match was that you can only beat what's put in front of you, but we didn't.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 2263
What happened to Phill T? He was a glass half empty sorta chap.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: RevBall
Views: 2268
Wasn't he run out of town by by Mr Fish?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 2446
Revell has the tactical brain of a small dachsund with learning difficulties. There is no up side to him in charge.
reply to this article | return to the front page
5 people
Re: RevBall
Views: 2414
Thought we might have sto common ground but seems the inane rants are already back
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: RevBall
Views: 2357
It would be a dull world to agree on everything. It’s plain to see - well for me anyway - that this version of Revell is no different to the last. And that means only one thing - a basement battle. Why not make the change now?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 2698
This a good point , even if or I or others may not agree. But there is no need to use demongning language in general.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: RevBall
Views: 2192
What is ‘demongning’ language, may I ask?
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: RevBall
Views: 2189
I thought you of all people would be fluent in Demongning!
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 1415
I’m not, unfortunately. Nor the ‘corrected’ ‘deamining’ either!!
Edited by Spirit of East Coast Boro at 15:47:53 on 28th August 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 2561
Sweeney with another clean sheet. Made one mistake early first half (and Pidge kicked it straight to their player instead of anywhere but no one criticises that mistake), made some important interceptions. Restricted Burton to one chance when they got behind Butler. Had our best chance (header).
reply to this article | return to the front page
3 people
Re: RevBall
Views: 2505
Pidge is a great defender but his long ball clearances are woeful.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: RevBall
Views: 2382
So play it short to Louis or Harvey in CM. Or to Butler to his left.
(Not Sweenz obv, he'll just lump it anyway).
One of them should be showing most of the time
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: RevBall
Views: 2472
Sadly it does limit the way we can play to an extent.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Previous thread: 🎙️SFC POD: Match Preview / Boro v Lincoln by Boromatt28/8 10:17Wed Aug 28 10:17:07 2024view thread