BOROCHAT
Newest article: 🎙️SFC POD: Exeter v Boro / S6 EP15 by BoromattYesterday 10:41Yesterday at 10:41:22view thread
Oldest article: Turbo boost for the club this summer by WASP22/4 19:28Mon Apr 22 19:28:20 2024view thread
Next thread: Chuds by ForestBoro3510/8 19:25Sat Aug 10 19:25:07 2024view thread
Attendance
Views: 899
3357.
Main stand looked like a friendly in the highlights.
Considerable step down from last seasons average.
As an expat fan, I haven't followed much of this new Sky TV package, but I suspect this will be contributing to the drop? Hopefully the Sky payout is worth more than missing ~1000-1500 through the gates.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Attendance
Views: 792
It's also worth factoring in that the trains were absolutely f***ed yesterday. Lots of people who don't drive coming in from surrounding towns would have had to bail out
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Attendance
Views: 829
3962 with 417 away when we played Shrewsbury at home as our first home game on 12th August last season.
3357 with 437 away playing them first on 10th August this season.
But cannot put it down to Sky yet as multiple other contributing factors (last year being on the back of promotion, our first time back in L1 etc.).
It will definitely have an impact though, particularly for midweek games as they are all on TV.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Attendance
Views: 824
Actually as far as aware EFL and Sky have never said what clubs are getting paid, I understand it the same for each team although will.be variances based on what league you are in
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Attendance
Views: 820
We are getting 25% more than we previously got.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Attendance
Views: 815
But what was the old and new actual.fig, realise no one can answer that here
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Attendance
Views: 804
Is that all?
We've accepted multiple televised games and screwed KO times for a 25% increase.
Most of which will be gobbled up by increased player wage demands anyway.
Gates will fall and atmosphere will suffer.
Advertising revenue will go up I guess.
Why are club chairmen all so short sighted in voting these things through?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Attendance
Views: 768
Championship has increased 46%, so will all be worth it once we get promoted.
Edit: A minimum of 16 of our televised matches are not permitted to have the KO time changed, so most matches will be unaffected by that. Although we have already had five, of course.
Edited by Chuds at 10:17:35 on 11th August 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Attendance
Views: 752
It's not helpful money though.
If every club in the league gets it, there is zero advantage.
Especially when it goes straight out the door to agents and players.
The more successful you get in terms of which league you're in, the more money you have to lose to compete. Fucking stupid.
And it's all down to the owners who vote for the changes/rules.
No other business operates like that.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Attendance
Views: 698
Whilst I partly agree, I also actually disagree.
I think we will be less negatively impacted than (almost) every other club in the league.
We have a small fanbase, many of whom are pretty dedicated, so we are likely to see less of a reduction in attendances than (most) others and so will lose less income as a result than they do. Also, with us having probably the 23rd smallest attendance this season, maybe even 24th, the new deal will represent a far greater percentage of income for us in relatiom to gate receipts, compared to the other clubs.
Edited by Chuds at 11:44:14 on 11th August 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Attendance
Views: 706
Isn't the same in PL though you get around 100 million a year whoever you are plus there a parachute payment of same amount if you go down hence yo yo clubs
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Attendance
Views: 690
There are also parachute payments in the EFL.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Attendance
Views: 812
Perhaps plus also could be fans on holiday,nor sure how other teams crowds held up.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 993
Why are the teams in the league table for places 3 to 11 not in alphabetical order as they all have the same points and goal difference?
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 1074
Goes on goals scored first (after goal difference)
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 1045
For what it's worth, i thought second half we were really good.
First half wasn't great but the second balf we could've had 3+
Shrewsbury are still terrible.
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Thread
Views: 1185
Thats a really important win.
Having a team you expect to beat first up can really set a bad tone if you dont get a positive result.
Buzzing for Listy great finish.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: Match Thread
Views: 1293
Quite a middle of the road performance. Shrewsbury didn’t offer much Bloxham chance aside (well done to the keeper for getting something on it), we had a few half chances and thankfully didn’t rue missing the penalty. List and Kemp looked lively. Simpson was a handful too. Hopefully will have settled a few nerves to kick off with a win and a clean sheet.
Huddersfield will be tricky next weekend. I’m glad we’re going there with three points to our name.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 1274
Would've been joint top if Kemp didn't miss the penalty, and instead we are 11th. Room for improvement.
Edited by Sev at 19:43:32 on 10th August 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: Match Thread
Views: 1296
It was absolutely essential to win that, as I said on an earlier post. We did enough and that's all that matters for now, but will need to raise our game v better teams.
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Concerning
Views: 1490
That we haven’t scored so far this season!
reply to this article | return to the front page
1-0 -List
Views: 1441
Good to see him on the score sheet early in the season.
Game hasn't been exactly electric so far but it always takes a while to gel I guess.
Sky Sports camera work much better than the single ifollow camera. But miss the 3CR comms
reply to this article | return to the front page
2 people
Re: 1-0 -List
Views: 821
Seems at least 2 cameras now ? One on ET and spotted one at back of South Stand
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: 1-0 -List
Views: 1328
I enjoyed completely missing the last minute of injury time because of a fault
reply to this article | return to the front page
1 person
Re: 1-0 -List
Views: 1301
Can't believe we conceded 2 in the 94th minute
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: 1-0 -List
Views: 1313
Yeah that was very poor from Sky Sports. Assume they cut the feed when the ref blew the whistle, but with delay we missed the last minute.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: 1-0 -List
Views: 1293
Oh shit! Glad it cut out now
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Never a pen
Views: 1374
Agreed. I'd be annoyed if that was given against us.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Never a pen
Views: 1082
Stuck with Shrews commentary team thanks to ifollow, they didn't think it was a pen either.
But they were adamant the shout we had late in the second half was.
So it evened itself out
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Never a pen
Views: 1171
Appéré falling over? Never a pen
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Never a pen
Views: 1377
He ran into him. Need to see this out now, Shrewsbury are as dogshit as I thought they would be...
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Never a pen
Views: 1338
Well, we didn't make the most of it!
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Never a pen
Views: 1366
Hope we don't regret that!
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 1459
ÂŁ5.50 for a grotty burger.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 894
Should have popped over the road to Fairlands and paid ÂŁ6 to park ÂŁ25 to get in before you shell our on food or drink.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 1108
The hot dog was wurst
Edited by Sev at 20:31:01 on 10th August 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
4 people
Re: Match Thread ifollow
Views: 1545
Anyone else using ifollow audio.
Same shit different season.
Listening on the Stevenage website.
Got Salop.comms.
No option to change to Home comms.
Wankers.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread ifollow
Views: 1467
Yes same here……no option for a home commentary at all. Makes you wonder if there is a home commentary anywhere?
Well I’m buggred….SW and DT have just turned up :)). Briefly
Edited by Mike H at 18:34:14 on 10th August 2024
Edited by Mike H at 18:44:52 on 10th August 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread ifollow
Views: 924
I sit right next to SW and can vouch for the fact that they (he and Deano) were commentating for the whole match.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread ifollow
Views: 1032
Not on ifollow though…..just a ten minute slot at the start of the second half.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread ifollow
Views: 1323
Reloading makes no difference.
Email ifollow for a refund.
Only ÂŁ2:50 but that way they might get their finger out. Cowboy outfit.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 1591
This match has real League 2 energy so far
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 1540
I've already ripped up my season ticket
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 1452
Not a scintillating first half, but thought we were easily the better team
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 1313
Whatever the end result, it does look like Shrewsbury are shit and will struggle this season.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 1512
I thought we were difficultly the better team.
reply to this article | return to the front page
NOW TV
Views: 1305
My feed cut out before the end. Like a minute before. Sid anyone else have that problem?!
Edited by RockyBottom at 19:23:20 on 10th August 2024
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: NOW Tv
Views: 953
And I looked at about three other matches and it happened to all of those too. Infuriating when you’re on a 1 goal lead with about 2 mins to go! I reckon Sky had a major problem across the board.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 1554
Interesting that there is no Appéré.
Eagerly awaiting to see how we set up.
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 1571
'Eagerly awaiting to see how we set up.'
We've come for a point!
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 1666
Toby Savin in goal for Shrewsbury so I predict we win 8-0
reply to this article | return to the front page
Re: Match Thread
Views: 1496
We need to be testing Savin, we know what he's like!
It's pretty dire to watch from an enjoyment point of view so far! Hopefully this isn't a benchmark for the season!
reply to this article | return to the front page
Previous thread: Season Ticket Collection by Telboy10/8 08:09Sat Aug 10 08:09:26 2024view thread