BOROCHAT

Return to front page

Newest article: Re: Hollywood FC by WASPToday 21:53Today at 21:53:31view thread

Oldest article: Revs should be sacked. by WASP2/11/2024 18:00Sat Nov 2 18:00:32 2024view thread

MenuSearch

Next thread: 1-0 up HT by Freemo22/2 15:50Sat Feb 22 15:50:37 2025view thread

Re: Attendances - FAO of Chuds

By Sev21/2 23:34Fri Feb 21 23:34:07 2025In response to Re: Attendances - FAO of Chuds

Views: 426

Aye, I was forgetting that we have the Tifosy investors now. I would normal assume no dividend as the only shareholders are Phil and the Supporters Association. I can't imagine either of them would have dividends.

But there was a 25% (of share cost) dividend paid on the Tifosy shares when we got promoted to League One so that might be in these upcoming accounts, not sure when it would have been paid? So that has to be taken into account when looking at the movement in reserves. There was 12,420 of them A shares and they cost £25 each so that dividend would have amounted to £77,625. So I'm going to claim a profit if the movement is more than minus £77,625 😄

There was meant to be the abolition of the exemption for small companies not to have to prepare a P&L but not sure on the timeframe for that coming. Certainly be more interesting when they have to publish a P&L as well.

reply to this article | return to the front page

1 person likes this 1 person

Next article in this thread: Re: Attendances - FAO of Chuds by Balders21/2 21:48Fri Feb 21 21:48:35 2025

Previous thread: If Revell was to leave by ForestBoro35 19/2 13:13Wed Feb 19 13:13:24 2025view thread